I read it as two things: 1) Critical Engineers are skeptical that "rich user experiences" are the most effective way of interacting with systems, 2) "rich user experiences" tend to oversimplify and misrepresent systems for the sake of usability or aesthetics.
To deconstruct means something like "disassemble" or "reverse engineer" - to reduce something to its constituent parts in order to de-mystify it. Quite a lot of posts on HN do this - explaining how some particular effect is achieved via clever hacks.
"Inciting suspicion" is about encouraging people to ask questions about why an interface works the way it does. Is it a dark pattern[1]? Why those options, why that layout, what is the person who designed this trying to encourage me to do?
Comments
I've read that a dozen times and I still have no idea what it's supposed to mean, is this meant to be a Koan?
I read it as two things: 1) Critical Engineers are skeptical that "rich user experiences" are the most effective way of interacting with systems, 2) "rich user experiences" tend to oversimplify and misrepresent systems for the sake of usability or aesthetics.
To deconstruct means something like "disassemble" or "reverse engineer" - to reduce something to its constituent parts in order to de-mystify it. Quite a lot of posts on HN do this - explaining how some particular effect is achieved via clever hacks.
"Inciting suspicion" is about encouraging people to ask questions about why an interface works the way it does. Is it a dark pattern[1]? Why those options, why that layout, what is the person who designed this trying to encourage me to do?
[1] http://darkpatterns.org/
So it's not just me... the whole thing seems quite hard to understand, and somewhat full of hot air?
Perhaps its ironic: very simple user experience, impenetrable meaning.