Comment on A cash crunch at the Gnome FoundationparentComments−rdl12yThey meant cash turnover, not personnel turnover, I think. As in more money was coming in/going out, which led to cashflow issues.−busterarm12yThat makes sense. I misread that badly.−rdl12yI read it exactly as you did the first time through; it was unclear as written.
Comments
They meant cash turnover, not personnel turnover, I think. As in more money was coming in/going out, which led to cashflow issues.
That makes sense. I misread that badly.
I read it exactly as you did the first time through; it was unclear as written.