Comment on Fat BinariesparentComments−z_OP12ySpace is cheaper than ever. There two "competing" architectures (arm vs. x86). NetBSD has solution the distinct platform compilation problem.What is a compelling argument against having fat binaries everywhere? Especially given tools that can unpack/strip/lipo to the right architecture.−soneil12yNetBSD isn't mentioned in the wiki article at all. You appear to be using wiki to support an argument that you haven't made?A little context could go a long way here.
Comments
Space is cheaper than ever. There two "competing" architectures (arm vs. x86). NetBSD has solution the distinct platform compilation problem.
What is a compelling argument against having fat binaries everywhere? Especially given tools that can unpack/strip/lipo to the right architecture.
NetBSD isn't mentioned in the wiki article at all. You appear to be using wiki to support an argument that you haven't made?
A little context could go a long way here.