Fat Binariesen.wikipedia.org 2 pointsz_12 years ago4 commentsSaveHideCopy link On HNComments−holyjaw12ySo on mobile this link just took me to a Wikipedia page with absolutely zero context. Am I missing something?−IbJacked12yWhat about 'em?−z_OP12ySpace is cheaper than ever. There two "competing" architectures (arm vs. x86). NetBSD has solution the distinct platform compilation problem.What is a compelling argument against having fat binaries everywhere? Especially given tools that can unpack/strip/lipo to the right architecture.−soneil12yNetBSD isn't mentioned in the wiki article at all. You appear to be using wiki to support an argument that you haven't made?A little context could go a long way here.
Comments
So on mobile this link just took me to a Wikipedia page with absolutely zero context. Am I missing something?
What about 'em?
Space is cheaper than ever. There two "competing" architectures (arm vs. x86). NetBSD has solution the distinct platform compilation problem.
What is a compelling argument against having fat binaries everywhere? Especially given tools that can unpack/strip/lipo to the right architecture.
NetBSD isn't mentioned in the wiki article at all. You appear to be using wiki to support an argument that you haven't made?
A little context could go a long way here.