From what I read in the post I don't think the publisher is stealing the images so much as rejecting them if they don't meet the license requirements.
While this paper illustrates an unfortunate side-effect, it's really no different to the Linux kernel rejecting code that isn't under a GPL2-compatible license.
Comments
From what I read in the post I don't think the publisher is stealing the images so much as rejecting them if they don't meet the license requirements.
While this paper illustrates an unfortunate side-effect, it's really no different to the Linux kernel rejecting code that isn't under a GPL2-compatible license.