Skip to content

Comment on The awkward copyright collision of Fair Use and Creative Commonsparent

Comments

The author even brings this up "This is not a problem with Creative Commons per se, but a structural issue with publishers that are inflexible in how they handle content." Then IMMEDIATELY continues with "I thought I’d share it here, though, as a counter-intuitive example of how Creative Commons can suppress the distribution of information." EXCEPT this is NOT an example (counter intuitive, or otherwise) of how CC can suppress distribution. Rather this is an example of publishers STEALING images. As the author pointed out, if the paper uses copyrighted photos with permission, or by fair use, the publisher of the paper CAN NOT just apply CC licensing to those photos. This is not a problem with CC this is a problem with the publisher.

From what I read in the post I don't think the publisher is stealing the images so much as rejecting them if they don't meet the license requirements.

While this paper illustrates an unfortunate side-effect, it's really no different to the Linux kernel rejecting code that isn't under a GPL2-compatible license.

AboutSource Built by g1lg1l

Hackerly is an independent reader for Hacker News, built on the public HN API. Not affiliated with Y Combinator.