Many of the states refused to create their own exchanges, thus the Federal site needed to be more extensive than originally planned (not that's an excuse for the screw-ups at all). States that have their own exchanges seem to be doing better, from anecdotal evidence supplied so far…
It is an interesting question though of why we need a federal site in the first place in order to shop for a commercial product. We are required to have car insurance but we don't need the state government running a car insurance shopping site. I am not for/against the Affordable Care Act, but I think it is a legitimate question.
Comments
Many of the states refused to create their own exchanges, thus the Federal site needed to be more extensive than originally planned (not that's an excuse for the screw-ups at all). States that have their own exchanges seem to be doing better, from anecdotal evidence supplied so far…
It is an interesting question though of why we need a federal site in the first place in order to shop for a commercial product. We are required to have car insurance but we don't need the state government running a car insurance shopping site. I am not for/against the Affordable Care Act, but I think it is a legitimate question.
Well the answer is that government sites will determine subsidies. That includes verifying income and checking with numerous federal agencies. http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/the-switch/wp/2013/10/09...
requirements for car insurance are set by each state, IIRC. and not everyone has a car - it's not mandatory. Everyone has a ... 'health'.