Skip to content

Comment on Xerox responds to the recent character substitution issueparent

Comments

JBIG2 is not the problem. It is perfectly possible to do lossless compression with JBIG2. They just set its options to do some overly aggressive compression.

I would wager JBIG2 is the problem when Xerox couldn't implement it properly.

"Normal" is an overly aggressive compression setting? Is that an overly aggressive setting for the end-user or for Xerox to be implementing in their hardware marketed to law firms?

AboutSource Built by g1lg1l

Hackerly is an independent reader for Hacker News, built on the public HN API. Not affiliated with Y Combinator.