I don't see them doing that. From the article summary:
From October 20, applicants to the Fair Work Commission will need to disclose AI use, while a template to help AI-dependent litigants has been implemented.
That sounds very fair to me. I wouldn't categorize that as disruption to other people's cases.
Comments
I think I'm beginning to see why Mr. Khan was let go. That's a mind-numbing lack of care put forth there.
But keep in mind, they are citing the dumbest case that doesn't matter as justification to disrupt other people's cases. It's absurd.
I don't see them doing that. From the article summary:
That sounds very fair to me. I wouldn't categorize that as disruption to other people's cases.