Skip to content

Comment on Apple rejects Drones+ thrice. App maker looks to Androidparent

Comments

No, that's my point. Through careful censorship, Apple has crafted a marketplace that offends nobody. App developers find this environment valuable, that's why they are so eager to sell their content in the app store.

If you, as a customer or a developer, don't agree with apple's well documented policy here, there are alternatives you can choose. Consumers and developers have overwhelmingly said they either don't care or like the censorship though.

"...Apple has crafted a marketplace that offends nobody."

Apple could keep this curated marketplace and at the same time allow sideloading of applications, like many Android phones do. By taking that simple step, concerns about censorship would be ameliorated.

> Through careful censorship, Apple has crafted a marketplace that offends nobody.

Impossible. Through careful thinking and reading up on philosophies of human rights and ethics, many people (myself included) have carefully cultivated values that take a deep offence to very public things deliberately crafted to offend nobody.

I mean, really, how long until the only way to offend someone with an iPhone is to chuck it in their face? ("Be glad that wasn't an unmanned drone you just got hit by!")

Or just write "for the prettiest one" on it, leave it at a wedding party and joyously partake of a hotdog (no bun).

> Apple has crafted a marketplace that offends nobody.

There sure is a lot outrage over their policies for a marketplace that "offends nobody".

AboutSource Built by g1lg1l

Hackerly is an independent reader for Hacker News, built on the public HN API. Not affiliated with Y Combinator.