Ya was gonna say the first thing i saw was basically a "correction" post and then you read that and hit
"The actual reason why I think you shouldn’t use SQLite is one of time constraints: Implementing a layer of SQLite will probably take you more time than simply to reduce the amount of files. "
Like no i'm sorry implementing a SQLite layer, vs implementing a filesystem layer is the same time or faster. I mean seriously he thinks trying to negotiate how to stop having 600,000 files is easier than just... ummm... using standard sql?
Comments
Ya was gonna say the first thing i saw was basically a "correction" post and then you read that and hit
"The actual reason why I think you shouldn’t use SQLite is one of time constraints: Implementing a layer of SQLite will probably take you more time than simply to reduce the amount of files. "
Like no i'm sorry implementing a SQLite layer, vs implementing a filesystem layer is the same time or faster. I mean seriously he thinks trying to negotiate how to stop having 600,000 files is easier than just... ummm... using standard sql?