Ya was gonna say the first thing i saw was basically a "correction" post and then you read that and hit
"The actual reason why I think you shouldn’t use SQLite is one of time constraints: Implementing a layer of SQLite will probably take you more time than simply to reduce the amount of files. "
Like no i'm sorry implementing a SQLite layer, vs implementing a filesystem layer is the same time or faster. I mean seriously he thinks trying to negotiate how to stop having 600,000 files is easier than just... ummm... using standard sql?
Comments
Not sure why this got posted when the follow-up claws back much of it and leaves a pretty weak conclusion: https://www.hendrik-erz.de/post/should-you-use-sqlite
Ya was gonna say the first thing i saw was basically a "correction" post and then you read that and hit
"The actual reason why I think you shouldn’t use SQLite is one of time constraints: Implementing a layer of SQLite will probably take you more time than simply to reduce the amount of files. "
Like no i'm sorry implementing a SQLite layer, vs implementing a filesystem layer is the same time or faster. I mean seriously he thinks trying to negotiate how to stop having 600,000 files is easier than just... ummm... using standard sql?