Point taken. In retrospect, directfs is not a good name as it gives the impression of a new filesystem implemention. I should have named this more along the lines of "direct access mode" as some of you have pointed out.
I think the comment which was in response to mine is pretty ambiguous, it isn’t obvious to me what they mean by “here” (in the article, in the comment I responded to, or in my comment?).
Comments
directfs has nothing to do with DirectX.
I find it deeply ironic this needs to be said here.
As the other commenter wrote, I was replying directly to the parent and was referring to DirectStorage. I use DirectX apis daily haha
DirectStorage does, thought.
Ah... Okay, I think I see how the comment should have been read now...?
I will blame whoever named directfs for using a confounding name one way or the other. :V
Author of the blog here.
Point taken. In retrospect, directfs is not a good name as it gives the impression of a new filesystem implemention. I should have named this more along the lines of "direct access mode" as some of you have pointed out.
Thanks for the feedback.
I think the comment which was in response to mine is pretty ambiguous, it isn’t obvious to me what they mean by “here” (in the article, in the comment I responded to, or in my comment?).