Skip to content

Comment on How to correct a team member: avoid my damaging rookie mistakesparent

Comments

That's what I'm saying. Your interaction there is not a positive one, and it's based on a gotcha from a bad manager.

It should start more like this:

conversation happens between manager/managed who have built up a relationship based on trust via transparency in action and word over more than the last 12 hours

X: So yesterday [bad thing] happened, and it seems to be based on choices you made. My perception of what happened was [perception here]. I wanted to talk to you to see what the reason was, and let you explain why we did [choices].

This is, as you point out, called genuine empathy. We have to label it as 'ask to understand' (side note, I fucking hate Steven Covey), because so much management literature since the 1980's told us to remove empathy/sympathy and emotion. Injecting it back in, appropriately, is difficult for some people without a matrix or checklist.

The problem is, that checklist is often used as a substitute for the real work of managers - building relationships and guiding people to see they can do better, even when performing at their best.

AboutSource Built by g1lg1l

Hackerly is an independent reader for Hacker News, built on the public HN API. Not affiliated with Y Combinator.