Is anyone aggregating discussions like this today?
That's something I'd like to see as an official feature on HN or reddit. In addition of normal comments on the article you can also add "additional information from a qualified source" (which can be either a qualified user or another article from another reputable journalist).
But I am not sure if that would work. Perhaps it would be fine on HN, but it would be difficult to enforce and moderate on reddit.
I'd love for a TechMeme style site that sorts and organizes the articles more intelligently ( sort out the articles that just say the same thing without adding anything new, mark and organize responses and followup third party articles as 'informative', 'rebuttal', or 'support', etc.
Comments
Thanks for sharing - I wouldn't have found this otherwise.
Is anyone aggregating discussions like this today?
NYT has some opinion pieces and shares rebuttals, but I haven't seen long-form opinion aggregators around.
That's something I'd like to see as an official feature on HN or reddit. In addition of normal comments on the article you can also add "additional information from a qualified source" (which can be either a qualified user or another article from another reputable journalist).
But I am not sure if that would work. Perhaps it would be fine on HN, but it would be difficult to enforce and moderate on reddit.
Michael Tsai often does so on his apple-focused blog (e.g. Paid App Store Search[1]) but he hasn't gotten around to this discussion yet.
[1]http://mjtsai.com/blog/2016/04/15/paid-app-store-search/
I'd love for a TechMeme style site that sorts and organizes the articles more intelligently ( sort out the articles that just say the same thing without adding anything new, mark and organize responses and followup third party articles as 'informative', 'rebuttal', or 'support', etc.