Comment on Safari is more energy-efficient than Chrome and Firefox on OS XComments−X-Istence11yYouTube sends VP8 or VP9 videos to Chrome, whereas on Safari it uses h264, which can be decoded in hardware. That alone will have a huge difference in power associated with it.−Steko11yWould be interesting to see the YT tests redone with add ons that force h264 for Firefox and Chrome.
Comments
YouTube sends VP8 or VP9 videos to Chrome, whereas on Safari it uses h264, which can be decoded in hardware. That alone will have a huge difference in power associated with it.
Would be interesting to see the YT tests redone with add ons that force h264 for Firefox and Chrome.