Skip to content

Comment on Safari is more energy-efficient than Chrome and Firefox on OS Xparent

Comments

I suppose that just displaying a page and scrolling around it consumes little energy, with a short spike during the layout phase.

What really consumes energy is compiling and executing Javascript, and playing animations (flash, gif, css, video). JS engines of all three browsers are likely different. I also suspect that Safari, being essentially single-platform, can afford platform-specific optimizations (e.g cheaper non-public API calls).

AboutSource Built by g1lg1l

Hackerly is an independent reader for Hacker News, built on the public HN API. Not affiliated with Y Combinator.