Skip to content

Comment on Dynamic Languages Are Static Languages (2011)parent

Comments

While Haskel has quite a few tools to help assuage issues like this, I can't help but think that niche tools do not define the genre. When I hear "statically typed", I don't think of Haskel, I think of C, C++, Go, Java, and Rust.

All of these languages offer tools to handle similar duck typing via interfaces or traits or polymorphism, but they are far from simple to use.

When Haskel gains a mindshare outside of its current niche, or the type inference becomes more broadly implemented in languages used across our industry, then let's talk about how it makes statically typed languages better and easier to use than "unityped" languages.

AboutSource Built by g1lg1l

Hackerly is an independent reader for Hacker News, built on the public HN API. Not affiliated with Y Combinator.