Skip to content

Comment on Dynamic Languages Are Static Languages (2011)parent

Comments

The gymnastics part is correct. You have to convince the compiler the code you are producing is correct, even if it may be correct already. However, this makes your code way more unlikely to crash or be incorrect.

The "lot of abstractions" is the distinction between type and class the article addresses, I guess?

AboutSource Built by g1lg1l

Hackerly is an independent reader for Hacker News, built on the public HN API. Not affiliated with Y Combinator.