There are also real, documented, movement for men's rights, for example fathers rights organisations.
the fact that you'd make that comparison is, I think, extremely telling.
Could one not argue that it is telling us that there is a need for such organisations, and that the privileged mainstream prefers not to address such issues, because it would have to give up on some privileges?
As an aside, what is the reason that you mention the suffrage without mentioning that the suffrage movement did not campaign for women being included in the draft, when the only non-sexist resolution of the conundrum would have been (and still is) to legislate that suffrage should be given exactly to those who are subject to the draft? In other words, why did you omit mentioning this outrageous and still ongoing basic sexism of the suffrage movement?
Comments
There are also real, documented, movement for men's rights, for example fathers rights organisations.
Could one not argue that it is telling us that there is a need for such organisations, and that the privileged mainstream prefers not to address such issues, because it would have to give up on some privileges?As an aside, what is the reason that you mention the suffrage without mentioning that the suffrage movement did not campaign for women being included in the draft, when the only non-sexist resolution of the conundrum would have been (and still is) to legislate that suffrage should be given exactly to those who are subject to the draft? In other words, why did you omit mentioning this outrageous and still ongoing basic sexism of the suffrage movement?