There isn't a lot to compete on, and trying to make a table that has a lot of green checks under for our features while the competitions has less checks or "limited" features seems a bit silly.
There is a larger minimum quantity, but when you look at it, you might want to have archives for your backup as well as synced up backups, so you'll need a bit more storage, and the space can get used up pretty fast.
Comments
It looks almost exactly what rsync.net provides. They're established. Why aren't you telling me why your service is better than theirs?
Your prices do appear to be cheaper but as you've said with a much larger minimum quantity. Is cost the only significant differentiating factor?
There isn't a lot to compete on, and trying to make a table that has a lot of green checks under for our features while the competitions has less checks or "limited" features seems a bit silly.
There is a larger minimum quantity, but when you look at it, you might want to have archives for your backup as well as synced up backups, so you'll need a bit more storage, and the space can get used up pretty fast.