Too bad GitHub can't weight comments/issues by quality of contributor/user instead of only providing a binary choice of "only the contributors" vs "allowing everyone".
Those are absolutely awful metrics to use when measuring a developer's ability and talent, or the quality of this developer's contributions. They are also extremely easy to game, too.
Comments
Too bad GitHub can't weight comments/issues by quality of contributor/user instead of only providing a binary choice of "only the contributors" vs "allowing everyone".
But how do you measure that quality? Based on amount of contributions? Based on +1's they've received on comments?
Based on lines changed, merge requests accepted/rejected, etc etc.
You know, GitHub developers are quite smart.
They could just write their own weighting algorithm if they wanted to. :-)
Those are absolutely awful metrics to use when measuring a developer's ability and talent, or the quality of this developer's contributions. They are also extremely easy to game, too.
Yes, that's why I trust GitHub to come up with a (proprietary, unreleased) algorithm a la PageRank that won't easily be game-able.
That is truly an excellent idea. Comments like this remind me why I love this community so much. Thanks for sharing!