Skip to content

Comment on CRISPR Gene Editing

Comments

This actually raised an interesting thought to mind about the long-term ethical implications of lowering the barrier to entry for genetic engineering. What happens when anyone with a little know-how and $10K can use the techniques?

This actually raised an interesting thought to mind about the long-term ethical implications of lowering the barrier to entry for genetic engineering. What happens when anyone with a little know-how and $10K can use the techniques?

The barrier to entry for genetic engineering is already zero; but it has much less sexy names like "washing your hands" and "sex". DNA synthesis is just a matter of being more specific and deliberate about which biological organisms you keep around. Anyone is capable of selectively breeding bacteria, fungi, molds, or anything else. I think the reverse(?) question needs to be asked as well, which is what are the ethical implications of trying to restrict the ability to make DNA?

Here's some infotainment I guess: http://diyhpl.us/wiki/diybio/faq/news/

I should have been more specific, when I said 'genetic engineering' I was referring to using techniques like CRISPR to perform gene modifications in animals and humans.

No one with the resources required currently would surreptitiously test a new gene on another human, what happens when the resource and knowledge barrier drop?

There is a startup that runs genetic engineering experiments for you "in the cloud": https://www.arcturus.io/

AboutSource Built by g1lg1l

Hackerly is an independent reader for Hacker News, built on the public HN API. Not affiliated with Y Combinator.