Skip to content

Comment on On OS X, why does sudo ls show hidden (dot) files?

Comments

AFAIK, this is standard on any Unix platform, not just OS X. I also fail to see why this is news, this behaviour is decades old.

AFAIK, this is standard on any Unix platform, not just OS X.

This is incorrect, and the linked question actually mentions this…

This differs from what ls on Linux (the one coming from coreutils) does.
I also fail to see why this is news, this behaviour is decades old.

Straight from the guidelines,

On-Topic: Anything that good hackers would find interesting. That includes more than hacking and startups. If you had to reduce it to a sentence, the answer might be: anything that gratifies one's intellectual curiosity.

I found it interesting, as the behavior surprises me, and I had no idea BSD ls did this.

This is incorrect, and the linked question actually mentions this…

Actually it mentions how this comes from BSD, which is a direct descendant of Unix.

This differs from what ls on Linux (the one coming from coreutils) does.

Linux is not Unix.

Anything that good hackers would find interesting.

It's amusing that the default behaviour of ls would be interesting to hackings.

AboutSource Built by g1lg1l

Hackerly is an independent reader for Hacker News, built on the public HN API. Not affiliated with Y Combinator.