That seems overly simplistic, given the diverse claims as to the nature of God/Gods.
To pick one, the Judaeo-Christian god seems to be unwilling to allow proof of its existence. This seems to be intentional, to place the acceptance/rejection of its existence onto a plane of personal faith, rather than provable fact.
Comments
I take issue with your analogy, as these are all moral questions. In contrast, "What happened to the dinosaurs" is a factual question.
"Does God exist" seems pretty factual to me.
That seems overly simplistic, given the diverse claims as to the nature of God/Gods.
To pick one, the Judaeo-Christian god seems to be unwilling to allow proof of its existence. This seems to be intentional, to place the acceptance/rejection of its existence onto a plane of personal faith, rather than provable fact.
Fair enough.