This is an example of precisely the kind of false-positive that you would expect to have emerge when you leave it up to machine learning over publicly available information to try to figure out the answer to a question.
I kind of agree TBH, although I would say their search engine (as it is today) and a 'fact-repo' are quite different things. I'd expect a higher level of rigour in the fact-repo ML checking processes.
Comments
This is an example of precisely the kind of false-positive that you would expect to have emerge when you leave it up to machine learning over publicly available information to try to figure out the answer to a question.
I kind of agree TBH, although I would say their search engine (as it is today) and a 'fact-repo' are quite different things. I'd expect a higher level of rigour in the fact-repo ML checking processes.