it sits there and does its job; you don't interact with it at all.
This is more than can be said for the "half price" lead-acid batteries, which need to be periodically checked for corrosion and cleaned. Non-sealed batteries need to be topped off with distilled water annually. All PbA batteries (flooded and AGM!) require the hydrogen vent be checked for obstructions and maintained. That vent is an extra wall penetration for mice, insects, heat loss, etc. The entire battery bank also needs to be equalized every ~6 months, which may or may not be done automatically.
Sounds like the Powerwall's "no interaction" model is already better than the competition.
AGM and gel type batteries are collectively known as valve-regulated lead-acid or VRLA types. The maintenance procedures you described are for flooded batteries (FLA) and are neither required nor even possible with VRLA batteries.
You can save even more money by using FLA if you're willing to do the maintenance. If you're not, the direct comparison is with VRLA. VRLA is much cheaper than the Powerwall on an apples-to-apples basis.
It's hard to point to a specific source describing maintenance procedures that don't exist. For example, a common manufacturer's manual may be found at http://rollsbattery.com/public/docs/user_manual/Rolls_Batter.... Note the difference between FLA and AGM (VRLA) maintenance procedures. Specifically, there are none for the latter.
So that's your pitch, no vent? All modern VRLA batteries are fully recombinant and that vent is only for safety (see for example https://www.gsbattery.com/content/vrla). It requires no maintenance, inspection, or installation accommodation according to any manufacturer's recommendations I can find. And unfortunately, lithium-ion cells have vents, too, for the same reason: to limit the risk of explosion due to overcharging or cell defects. See among many other examples http://batteryuniversity.com/learn/article/lithium_ion_safet.... You can find discussions of venting in these cells in articles about Boeing's problems with the Dreamliner batteries.
I can see no material distinction here. Even if I were to accept that the vent design in Li-ion cells is superior to that of VRLA designs, it wouldn't justify paying twice as much for the same capabilities.
Comments
This is more than can be said for the "half price" lead-acid batteries, which need to be periodically checked for corrosion and cleaned. Non-sealed batteries need to be topped off with distilled water annually. All PbA batteries (flooded and AGM!) require the hydrogen vent be checked for obstructions and maintained. That vent is an extra wall penetration for mice, insects, heat loss, etc. The entire battery bank also needs to be equalized every ~6 months, which may or may not be done automatically.
Sounds like the Powerwall's "no interaction" model is already better than the competition.
http://rimstar.org/renewnrg/off_grid_solar_battery_maintenan...
AGM and gel type batteries are collectively known as valve-regulated lead-acid or VRLA types. The maintenance procedures you described are for flooded batteries (FLA) and are neither required nor even possible with VRLA batteries.
You can save even more money by using FLA if you're willing to do the maintenance. If you're not, the direct comparison is with VRLA. VRLA is much cheaper than the Powerwall on an apples-to-apples basis.
It's hard to point to a specific source describing maintenance procedures that don't exist. For example, a common manufacturer's manual may be found at http://rollsbattery.com/public/docs/user_manual/Rolls_Batter.... Note the difference between FLA and AGM (VRLA) maintenance procedures. Specifically, there are none for the latter.
[deleted]
So that's your pitch, no vent? All modern VRLA batteries are fully recombinant and that vent is only for safety (see for example https://www.gsbattery.com/content/vrla). It requires no maintenance, inspection, or installation accommodation according to any manufacturer's recommendations I can find. And unfortunately, lithium-ion cells have vents, too, for the same reason: to limit the risk of explosion due to overcharging or cell defects. See among many other examples http://batteryuniversity.com/learn/article/lithium_ion_safet.... You can find discussions of venting in these cells in articles about Boeing's problems with the Dreamliner batteries.
I can see no material distinction here. Even if I were to accept that the vent design in Li-ion cells is superior to that of VRLA designs, it wouldn't justify paying twice as much for the same capabilities.