Skip to content

Comment on Warrantless airport seizure of laptop “cannot be justified,” judge rulesparent

Comments

That has to be some kind of fallacy:

The implication that just because a best-prepared "opponent" can thwart someone, there's no point in engaging the <unknown>-prepared.

I think it fits into the "perfectionist fallacy"[1] category. I don't really know how widespread the name of this fallacy though.

[1] http://www.mhhe.com/mayfieldpub/ct/ch06/glossary.htm

There's got to be some threshold though - it's not best prepared. A few years ago we wouldn't use much cloud storage because there weren't many options to do so. Right now, if you are a terrorist and carry your data with you, unencrypted, you're a complete idiot and will likely fail in some other way.

I've had the same thoughts myself and always come up with the same conclusion: educated engineers would make great terrorists!

Turns out after a quick Google search there are a plethora of articles titled "Why are so many terrorists engineers?"

I wonder if there are many more good terrorists engineers who just haven't been caught yet.

AboutSource Built by g1lg1l

Hackerly is an independent reader for Hacker News, built on the public HN API. Not affiliated with Y Combinator.