Skip to content

Comment on Robinhood raises $50Mparent

Comments

They are likely also making money by selling the customer's order flow to large institutions/HFT firms who will happily pay significant sums for this. This is something most other retail brokers are also doing and have been doing for a while. The result is that you as the customer are paying indirectly by getting screwed on your fills.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Payment_for_order_flow http://blogs.wsj.com/moneybeat/2014/06/13/payments-to-big-br...

I wonder what the actual implications of "getting screwed on fills" really are.

If I'm buying AAPL as a casual retail consumer, and the market price at the absolute moment is $121.05, and I get "screwed" with a fill of $121.06, is that really a big deal? Especially considering that a few seconds later the true market price could jump in either direction?

As a professional trader who's head is in the moment, sure, that seems bad. But does it REALLY matter for a casual long-term investor? My hunch is no. (I know I couldn't care less if I pay a few pennies more or less - I'm not using Robinhood for day trading, and that's not the point or their pitch.)

The result is that you as the customer are paying indirectly by getting screwed on your fills.

Citation needed. Its entirely possible that order flow traders are actually providing better/equivalent fills than can be obtained without them.

I've seen no long term studies one way or the other, though I admit on first blush order flow payment seems dodgy.

AboutSource Built by g1lg1l

Hackerly is an independent reader for Hacker News, built on the public HN API. Not affiliated with Y Combinator.