Skip to content

Comment on The Lux Programming Languageparent

Comments

I wanted a Lisp, not just a functional language.

I also wanted to push things forward in some aspects, like having the module system, first-class types & having higher interaction with the compiler.

Also, Haskell & macros don't seem to mix so well, and meta-programming is a big deal for me.

"Also, Haskell & macros don't seem to mix so well, and meta-programming is a big deal for me."

With the ability to manipulate more of the components of your programs in regular code, macros become less important. But if you want to do compile-time metaprogramming in Haskell, Template Haskell is effective - typed or untyped.

AboutSource Built by g1lg1l

Hackerly is an independent reader for Hacker News, built on the public HN API. Not affiliated with Y Combinator.