The german, simple english and spanish versions of the same Wikipedia article do not include the "hidden"-part. Doesn't that seem a little bit inconsistent?
Probably because Language in general is far from consistent and accurate, and i won't waste time discussing with you over abstraction details (thats what languages are).
What you say the authorities want is surely not what makes the security situation better, especially because of the increasing abuse potential. And just covering it up with some nice words won't make it any better.
There is no reason for you to care about my views of what the authorities want. The article goes into those details, with quotes from government officials about exactly what they want and links to sources.
Prime Minister Cameron declared that there should be “no means of communication” that his government “cannot read.” Yet he also stated that this would not involve a “back door.”
Why not, suggested [[NSA head] Rogers], require technology companies to create a digital key that could open any smartphone or other locked device to obtain text messages or photos, but divide the key into pieces so that no one person or agency alone could decide to use it?
I suggested that your comment "reads like a reflex action based on the title". I still do not believe that you read the article before making your comment.
Comments
The german, simple english and spanish versions of the same Wikipedia article do not include the "hidden"-part. Doesn't that seem a little bit inconsistent?
Probably because Language in general is far from consistent and accurate, and i won't waste time discussing with you over abstraction details (thats what languages are).
What you say the authorities want is surely not what makes the security situation better, especially because of the increasing abuse potential. And just covering it up with some nice words won't make it any better.
"What you say the authorities want..."
There is no reason for you to care about my views of what the authorities want. The article goes into those details, with quotes from government officials about exactly what they want and links to sources.
I suggested that your comment "reads like a reflex action based on the title". I still do not believe that you read the article before making your comment.
Look at the other first-level comments. /thread