This is basically a crowd-sourced programming language with fact-checking (by experimentation, on proposals before they are added).

A reductive explanation, yes, but I don't think it's inaccurate, based on what I could find on their site. Would love to be corrected if there's some large part I missed.

As far as actually constructive criticism, I'd really love it if this was the first thing I saw on quorumlang's homepage.