Care to elaborate (on both, i.e., what's the upstart issue and how a Debian vote relates to it)? It seems I missed all of that, but would be grateful to learn more.
Ubuntu created upstart around the same time systemd was created, both meant to replace the classic init system. Debian voted to adopt systemd as their new init system instead of upstart, and so now ubuntu, because of it's debian dependencies, will be dropping upstart and moving to systemd as well.
I guess I always sort of hoped they'd hold out against the tide of mediocrity sweeping the init systems of seemingly every distro save Gentoo these days.
Comments
Rather upset to see Ubuntu moving away from Upstart.
That happened shortly after the infamous Debian vote
Care to elaborate (on both, i.e., what's the upstart issue and how a Debian vote relates to it)? It seems I missed all of that, but would be grateful to learn more.
Ubuntu created upstart around the same time systemd was created, both meant to replace the classic init system. Debian voted to adopt systemd as their new init system instead of upstart, and so now ubuntu, because of it's debian dependencies, will be dropping upstart and moving to systemd as well.
Upstart predates systemd by over four years. I just checked the initial release dates on Wikipedia to confirm.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Upstart [August 24, 2006]
vs.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Systemd [30 March 2010]
Ta!
Here is the relevant HN thread with some discussion about it: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=7203364
I guess I always sort of hoped they'd hold out against the tide of mediocrity sweeping the init systems of seemingly every distro save Gentoo these days.