Comment on Ludwig WittgensteinparentComments−xenophanes16yDo you think it has value? What value?Why are you refusing to make a substantive comment? Given your refusal, why should I make a second one?Yes, debating who should go first is stupid. So why are you doing it? (I am doing it, now, b/c I am curious why you take this approach.)−rms16yI think the problem is that wynand didn't make the original reply to you, he just inserted himself into the debate without saying anything substantial.
Comments
Do you think it has value? What value?
Why are you refusing to make a substantive comment? Given your refusal, why should I make a second one?
Yes, debating who should go first is stupid. So why are you doing it? (I am doing it, now, b/c I am curious why you take this approach.)
I think the problem is that wynand didn't make the original reply to you, he just inserted himself into the debate without saying anything substantial.