Feynman has a philosophy book (_The Meaning of It All_) which is excellent. He discussed philosophy of science frequently in his books and lectures, and sometimes other types of philosophy, e.g. educational philosophy.
Feynman is not noted as a philosopher, which perhaps proves the point that people are looking for the wrong thing in a philosopher.
Comments
I definitely wouldn't want to throw away a century of philosophy, but I don't think we'd miss much if we threw away a century of philosophers.
Karl Popper was in that century. And Richard Feynman. That's two good philosophers.
Feynman was not a philosopher (which proves my point). Popper is indeed an exception.
Feynman has a philosophy book (_The Meaning of It All_) which is excellent. He discussed philosophy of science frequently in his books and lectures, and sometimes other types of philosophy, e.g. educational philosophy.
Feynman is not noted as a philosopher, which perhaps proves the point that people are looking for the wrong thing in a philosopher.