Scott Aaronson has commented negatively on a previous paper by the same authors [1]. I don't know if similar issues apply to this one:
[...] the paper advances the prediction that quantum computation will never be possible with more than 3 or 4 qubits. [...] I wonder: before uploading their paper, did the authors check whether their prediction was, y’know, already falsified? How do they reconcile their proposal with (for example) the 8-qubit entanglement observed by Haffner et al. with trapped ions [...]
(Note: that's a critique of the previous paper, not the linked one. Although the linked post mentions quantum computers not working, the linked paper does not touch the subjet.)
Comments
Scott Aaronson has commented negatively on a previous paper by the same authors [1]. I don't know if similar issues apply to this one:
(Note: that's a critique of the previous paper, not the linked one. Although the linked post mentions quantum computers not working, the linked paper does not touch the subjet.)
1: http://www.scottaaronson.com/blog/?p=1255