Skip to content

Comment on YC Open-Source Sales Agreement

Comments

When selling to larger enterprises, particularly high-value company-wide licenses, it's also often worth having a section in there defining who the customer is for the purposes of the agreement. (Do wholly or partially owned subsidiaries generally [or by express permission] get access? What about their subcontractors/joint-ventures/acquisitions?)

I'd be surprised if many larger enterprises agreed to 30 day payment terms and a late payment penalty clause - particularly one with interest compounding monthly - since they regularly take more than 30 days to pay invoices (the standard hack is to offer a reduction for payment within a certain time frame instead)

If I were the customer I'd also be extremely reticent about signing a contract which gives the vendor the right to increase the renewal rate thirty days ahead and also obliges me to automatically renew for the next period if I don't give thirty days notice. That could be an expensive decision to make in the space of an afternoon...

But, as a small company/start-up you should absolutely stand firm on 30 day payment, 45 at the most. It's completely ludicrous that large companies cannot pay in reasonable time-frames - it's just bullying, and is only done so that the large company can conserve cash. Most small businesses fail because of cash, and failure to pay by large customers is a big reason they get overstretched.

Yeah, I chuckled when I saw those clauses too.

Businesses do annual budgets. Try to push a 30-day notice of price changes at my employer, and we would kick you out or get painful concessions immediately. Ditto with auto-renewal.

These are consumer gym membership-like terms, I'm really surprised anyone gets good results with this doc as it stands.

AboutSource Built by g1lg1l

Hackerly is an independent reader for Hacker News, built on the public HN API. Not affiliated with Y Combinator.