For the sake of completion, do both. A NAS box with a S3 or Glacier backup routine will do it.
Now, I'm on the cheap side, but I find AWS expensive compared to other backup services like backblaze. Perhaps it's the backup services that are overly cheap, I don't know, but I'd love to have a cheaper service available for backing up from a NAS (backblaze seems to be pain to setup on a NAS). I'd be OK with major inconvenience on retreaval, as long as it's cheap to backup.
Now, I'm on the cheap side, but I find AWS expensive compared to other backup services like backblaze. Perhaps it's the backup services that are overly cheap, I don't know, but I'd love to have a cheaper service available for backing up from a NAS (backblaze seems to be pain to setup on a NAS). I'd be OK with major inconvenience on retreaval, as long as it's cheap to backup.
Glacier is $10/month for 1TB. For highly durable long-term storage, that is stupid cheap.
Comments
For the sake of completion, do both. A NAS box with a S3 or Glacier backup routine will do it.
Now, I'm on the cheap side, but I find AWS expensive compared to other backup services like backblaze. Perhaps it's the backup services that are overly cheap, I don't know, but I'd love to have a cheaper service available for backing up from a NAS (backblaze seems to be pain to setup on a NAS). I'd be OK with major inconvenience on retreaval, as long as it's cheap to backup.
Glacier is $10/month for 1TB. For highly durable long-term storage, that is stupid cheap.
For reference, Backblaze is half that price for unlimited data.