"But three years later, when he heard that Russell would be visiting the University of Chicago, the 15-year-old ran away from home and headed for Illinois. He never saw his family again."
Assuming that 80% of humanity lives on less than $10 a day, and are, therefore, poor, I can just imagine the number of geniuses born poor that will not ever be able to show their geniality to the world.
Imagine how the world would be a better place with all these people working as scientists, philosophers, mathematicians, etc.
I've taught in (Mexican) state programs for gifted youth and I can testify that a lot of the kids (many of them poor or almost) end up wasting their potential and having hard times, monetary wise. Meanwhile, significantly less hard working and less bright kids from private schools go on and get comfortable jobs.
A local think tank (http://pipe.cide.edu/talento-en-mexico) calculated the economical implications of not developing this talent. According to their model, on a 40 year span, developing it would give a 132% increase in the GDP per capita in comparison with staying at current levels.
Comments
"But three years later, when he heard that Russell would be visiting the University of Chicago, the 15-year-old ran away from home and headed for Illinois. He never saw his family again." Assuming that 80% of humanity lives on less than $10 a day, and are, therefore, poor, I can just imagine the number of geniuses born poor that will not ever be able to show their geniality to the world.
Imagine how the world would be a better place with all these people working as scientists, philosophers, mathematicians, etc.
I've taught in (Mexican) state programs for gifted youth and I can testify that a lot of the kids (many of them poor or almost) end up wasting their potential and having hard times, monetary wise. Meanwhile, significantly less hard working and less bright kids from private schools go on and get comfortable jobs.
A local think tank (http://pipe.cide.edu/talento-en-mexico) calculated the economical implications of not developing this talent. According to their model, on a 40 year span, developing it would give a 132% increase in the GDP per capita in comparison with staying at current levels.