I guess you wouldn't, you'd have a sort function afterwards.
...for Unix' insistence on composability, the shell tools are often unnecessarily monolithic, probably because that's the only sane way if the only type you have in interconnect is `string`.
Sure, but consider the common case of wanting the most recent file/directory in a directory. This would be something like "ls -t|head -n 1". It's pretty convenient, AND your ls function still returns only file and directory names, no additional information.
Here, you'd need to either parametrize the return type of ls to get simple strings (which is what you want most of time) or additional metadata, or alternatively to have different ls commands.
Comments
I guess you wouldn't, you'd have a sort function afterwards.
...for Unix' insistence on composability, the shell tools are often unnecessarily monolithic, probably because that's the only sane way if the only type you have in interconnect is `string`.
Sure, but consider the common case of wanting the most recent file/directory in a directory. This would be something like "ls -t|head -n 1". It's pretty convenient, AND your ls function still returns only file and directory names, no additional information.
Here, you'd need to either parametrize the return type of ls to get simple strings (which is what you want most of time) or additional metadata, or alternatively to have different ls commands.