Skip to content

Comment on How We Made GitHub Fast: A detailed look at GitHub's new architectureparent

Comments

> duplicate functionality that belongs at the lower layer, and drag along all kinds of extra baggage

I'm just talking about sending messages not any kind of new protocol on top, for example http://code.google.com/p/py-amqplib/source/browse/demo/demo_...

There's of course some overhead vs. a simple BERT-RPC to set up a broker (you can set up simple ones fast...), but that should be weighed against the gains you get.

And note that my curiosity/confusion also comes about because we are talking about a technology with a reliable software stack and money behind it (for example, RabbitMQ written in Erlang) vs. building a protocol from scratch. The situation is different if you are looking at equally mature technologies.

AboutSource Built by g1lg1l

Hackerly is an independent reader for Hacker News, built on the public HN API. Not affiliated with Y Combinator.