Comment on Keeping the Pirates at Bay – Copy and Crack Protection (2001)parentComments−slipstream-11yDoesn't the article also say they considered checking multiple times but decided against it to prevent too long load times?−sp33211yThe original comment was about the choice of checksum (CRC32), and a different algorithm might have made that harder if they had bothered to attack it.
Comments
Doesn't the article also say they considered checking multiple times but decided against it to prevent too long load times?
The original comment was about the choice of checksum (CRC32), and a different algorithm might have made that harder if they had bothered to attack it.