Comment on Twitter’s new R package for anomaly detectionComments−jcr11yThis is blogspam and a duplicate. The original url is here:https://blog.twitter.com/2015/introducing-practical-and-robu...And the previous discussion is here:https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=8846205−Hansi11yI wouldn't call it blogspam since r-bloggers.com is an opt-in aggregator. But yes a link to the original makes more sense.−Dzidas11yWhat's the point to credit middle man? Hacker news, reddit do the same (or even better), r-bloggers just rip off the content. Been there, done that.−Hansi11yThat's not what I said, my point was that labelling it blogspam doesn't seem correct because it's opt-in and a preferred source for articles for many in the R community. And as I said the original link should have been linked to.
Comments
This is blogspam and a duplicate. The original url is here:
https://blog.twitter.com/2015/introducing-practical-and-robu...
And the previous discussion is here:
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=8846205
I wouldn't call it blogspam since r-bloggers.com is an opt-in aggregator. But yes a link to the original makes more sense.
What's the point to credit middle man? Hacker news, reddit do the same (or even better), r-bloggers just rip off the content. Been there, done that.
That's not what I said, my point was that labelling it blogspam doesn't seem correct because it's opt-in and a preferred source for articles for many in the R community. And as I said the original link should have been linked to.