Skip to content

Comment on Keeping the Pirates at Bay (2001)

Comments

I question the utility of the metric used on this article: "Time it took for the first cracked versions to appear". A much more relevant indicator would be "Sales figures vs the previous game with less DRM".

If the sales figures where higher on the second game than on the first, a case could be made that the DRM used worked in transforming otherwise pirated copies into purchases. The effort spent on DRM would have been worth it (or not, if the increased sales didn't cover 2% programmer time, which is what was devoted to DRM efforts).

If the sales were more or less equal, then we could conclude that the DRM didn't affect the sales significantly; everyone who wanted to purchase the game, and could, did so. The effort spent on DRM would have been better spent somewhere else.

If the sales were less, then we might infer that early piracy actually helped increasing the sales of the game (through visibility). I doubt this was the case, but apparently it has happened with some games.

To make a comparison like that you would need a larger sample size than just 2 games. There are many other factors that can affect sales.

AboutSource Built by g1lg1l

Hackerly is an independent reader for Hacker News, built on the public HN API. Not affiliated with Y Combinator.