I disagree with that. I find it serious (as in, not sarcastic), reasonable (he acknowledge the good intentions and did present a one-side, extremist view-point), and made a unique, helpful point: that police ought not to view themselves as separate from the public they protect and serve.
Comments
^^ Anyone care to provide comment on why this is getting down voted?
Tone. Sarcasm. Structure of the argument.
I disagree with that. I find it serious (as in, not sarcastic), reasonable (he acknowledge the good intentions and did present a one-side, extremist view-point), and made a unique, helpful point: that police ought not to view themselves as separate from the public they protect and serve.