My point, and the reason I will still say MDBM is garbage, is that you can get mmap/zero-copy performance without sacrificing reliability. Only a fool would argue for the performance without reliability when they can get both. And with a lower total system cost.
Only a fool would argue for the performance without reliability when they can get both. And with a lower total system cost.
I think that statement is absolutely true. I just think you have a myopic view about how to achieve performance and reliability. Look at Yahoo's example use cases.
Comments
My point, and the reason I will still say MDBM is garbage, is that you can get mmap/zero-copy performance without sacrificing reliability. Only a fool would argue for the performance without reliability when they can get both. And with a lower total system cost.
I think that statement is absolutely true. I just think you have a myopic view about how to achieve performance and reliability. Look at Yahoo's example use cases.