Comment on Half the papers at NIPS would be rejected if the review process were rerunparentComments−userbinator11yUnless the reviewer doesn't actually know anything at all about what he/she claims to.It wouldn't surprise me at all if most of the general public would be unable to distinguish a SciGen-generated paper from a real one.−GFK_of_xmaspast11yWhat is such a person doing reviewing for the IEEE.
Comments
Unless the reviewer doesn't actually know anything at all about what he/she claims to.
It wouldn't surprise me at all if most of the general public would be unable to distinguish a SciGen-generated paper from a real one.
What is such a person doing reviewing for the IEEE.