Comment on Geiser: Emacs modes that conspire to keep the Lisp Machine spirit aliveComments−whitten11yI don't think the Lisp Machine actually ran Scheme, did it?−cpr11yNo, the two branches (Symbolics and Lisp Machines) ran their own Lisp Machine Lisp which was a fairly complex melange of MacLisp-derived CommonLisp-precursor constructs.Plus it had its own object system (Flavors).−lispm11yNo, but you could ran 'Pseudo Scheme' on it.http://mumble.net/~jar/pseudoscheme/The native languages though were Lisp Machine Lisp and then also versions of Common Lisp, for example Symbolics Common Lisp.−treerex11yNo, but that's really not the point of the analogy.
Comments
I don't think the Lisp Machine actually ran Scheme, did it?
No, the two branches (Symbolics and Lisp Machines) ran their own Lisp Machine Lisp which was a fairly complex melange of MacLisp-derived CommonLisp-precursor constructs.
Plus it had its own object system (Flavors).
No, but you could ran 'Pseudo Scheme' on it.
http://mumble.net/~jar/pseudoscheme/
The native languages though were Lisp Machine Lisp and then also versions of Common Lisp, for example Symbolics Common Lisp.
No, but that's really not the point of the analogy.