I wouldn't say the JVM is a proven multi-language JIT, FOSS or not.
It works for multiple languages that go the extra mile - e.g. Jython pays very dearly in performance because of the object model mismatch between Python and Java. And I haven't looked closely recently, but when Clojure first came out, the impedance mismatch between Clojure's persistent data structures and Java's mutable ones also had a ridiculous performance cost.
Mono is perhaps more deserving of that title, especially together with IKVM, (so, everything JVM), F#, IronPython and Boo. But note that everything is still shackled to the underlying object model.
But if anything, LLVM is the only proven multi-language JIT for FOSS platforms; it's method-at-a-time, which is great for staticly typed languages (whether those types are declared upfront or inferred), not so much for extremely dynamic languages.
Comments
I wouldn't say the JVM is a proven multi-language JIT, FOSS or not.
It works for multiple languages that go the extra mile - e.g. Jython pays very dearly in performance because of the object model mismatch between Python and Java. And I haven't looked closely recently, but when Clojure first came out, the impedance mismatch between Clojure's persistent data structures and Java's mutable ones also had a ridiculous performance cost.
Mono is perhaps more deserving of that title, especially together with IKVM, (so, everything JVM), F#, IronPython and Boo. But note that everything is still shackled to the underlying object model.
But if anything, LLVM is the only proven multi-language JIT for FOSS platforms; it's method-at-a-time, which is great for staticly typed languages (whether those types are declared upfront or inferred), not so much for extremely dynamic languages.
Scala is pretty widely used. JRuby seems to do quite well as well.
Future times should be interesting as well. I'd be interested to know if the work on value types in the JVM would be useful for Clojure.