I think we're agreeing. As I do for all blogs, I just assumed the courtesy implicit prelude: "This is my opinion shaped by my experiences and most likely only applies to the system I'm currently interacting with."
I mostly agree with his sweeping generalization if applied to, say, the subset of startups that get coverage on Techcrunch.
"As I do for all blogs, I just assumed the courtesy implicit prelude: "This is my opinion shaped by my experiences and most likely only applies to the system I'm currently interacting with.""
As did I, but if, as a writer, I made an unqualified claim (even if true) that is completely out of whack with my readers experience, I think it is fair to get push back. This is perhaps due to my coming across this article on HN vs directly on the original site.
I think the article is a decent one (not great, but decent).
"I mostly agree with his sweeping generalization if applied to, say, the subset of startups that get coverage on Techcrunch."
Comments
I think we're agreeing. As I do for all blogs, I just assumed the courtesy implicit prelude: "This is my opinion shaped by my experiences and most likely only applies to the system I'm currently interacting with."
I mostly agree with his sweeping generalization if applied to, say, the subset of startups that get coverage on Techcrunch.
"I think we're agreeing."
Yes we are.
"As I do for all blogs, I just assumed the courtesy implicit prelude: "This is my opinion shaped by my experiences and most likely only applies to the system I'm currently interacting with.""
As did I, but if, as a writer, I made an unqualified claim (even if true) that is completely out of whack with my readers experience, I think it is fair to get push back. This is perhaps due to my coming across this article on HN vs directly on the original site.
I think the article is a decent one (not great, but decent).
"I mostly agree with his sweeping generalization if applied to, say, the subset of startups that get coverage on Techcrunch."
As would I. But this is HN. :-)